Thanks.
>
> I like that idea. Best of both worlds. I will redo my patch to do that
> and resubmit.
>
> thanks,
> --Barry
>
>
> Dave Cramer wrote:
>
> > Bruce, Barry,
> >
> > How about checking for the existence of the date object in the
> > constructor? This would mean that it would only be created once per
> > thread.
> >
> > Dave
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org
> > [mailto:pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Momjian
> > Sent: June 25, 2001 2:50 PM
> > To: Barry Lind
> > Cc: Dave@micro-automation.net; 'PostgreSQL jdbc list'
> > Subject: Re: [JDBC] RE: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH]
> >
> >
> >>Bruce,
> >>
> >>I don't think you need to back out Dave's patch. It works fine as it
> >>is. I just think it can be improved upon.
> >>
> >
> > OK, you just let me know.
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026