Re: Why would this use 600Meg of VM?

* Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au> [010624 00:46]:
> At 01:06 24/06/01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> >The answer: the query has nothing to do with it.  However, the
> >deferred triggers you have on the target relation have a lot to do
> >with it.  It's all deferred-trigger-event storage.
> 
> Would it be worth using a local (system) temporary table for this sort of
> thing?
I this is an FK check, that I can probably turn off.  

I wonder if there is a better way? 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Philip Warner                    |     __---_____
> Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd.   |----/       -  \
> (A.B.N. 75 008 659 498)          |          /(@)   ______---_
> Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81         |                 _________  \
> Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82         |                 ___________ |
> Http://www.rhyme.com.au          |                /           \|
>                                  |    --________--
> PGP key available upon request,  |  /
> and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371   |/

-- 
Larry Rosenman                     http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812                 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749