Re: Red Hat DB announced - why not PostgreSQL?
| От | Zachary Beane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Red Hat DB announced - why not PostgreSQL? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20010620162312.B20316@xach.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Red Hat DB announced - why not PostgreSQL? (Adam Rossi <adam.rossi@platinumsolutions.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 03:39:44PM -0400, Adam Rossi wrote: > It looks like Red Hat has announced an open source database called Red Hat > Database: > > (via slashdot:) > http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/cn/20010619/tc/red_hat_to_play_in_oracle_s_arena_1.html > > Why is this not PostgreSQL? Why can't the Red Hat folks sell support to > PostgreSQL, rather than developing another open source database and > supporting that? Is it a conflict with GreatBridge? This looks like it could > have been a great opportunity for PostgreSQL.... This article was written based on some very vague statements made during a non-technical conference call. I think it would be worth waiting to see what is formally announced before running too far with speculation about it. Zach -- xach@xach.com Zachary Beane http://www.xach.com/
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: