Re: Re: Which Front End for Postgresql
От | Damaen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: Which Front End for Postgresql |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20010517.081824.1034949299.1689@magdelina.crazyhead обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: Which Front End for Postgresql (Tony Grant <tony@animaproductions.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
In article <989996977.1109.0.camel@tonux>, "Tony Grant" <tony@animaproductions.com> wrote: > > Funny thing is that SGI have rpms for RedHat XFS install... XFS is a > server file system is it not? > I believe the XFS you are speaking of is the X Font Server. Not a file system. Redhat does use ext2, though I have heard good and bad about ext3. > RedHat can be made into a server OS it just takes some work. Read the > excellent http://www.linuxdoc.org/links/p_books.html#securing_linux > I can't say as I agree... I've setup several servers on RH, for different purposes of course, but none of them too more than, I'd say 2 hours for the partitionaing, OS install, and configure of base servers, everything. As far as securing it, I simply use a decent firewall (modified v. of rc.firewall) and portsentry. That's all. > > I would personnaly choose FreeBSD for the PostgreSQL server and RedHat > as the client workstation. > I so far have not had much luck with FreeBSD, it has fought with me all the way. Consequently, I don't have a BSD box running right now. The only complaint I really have with it, since every OS has it's little quirks, is that it does not seem to be quite up to date with hardware. Scream and yell... yeah I know it's way off topic.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: