> There was some talk recently of putting together packages of function
> and operator definitions to ease portability from other DBMSes to PG.
> I'd have no objection to including "+ as string concatenation" in a
> set of operators that're clearly marked as MS-SQL-isms. But I don't
> think we'd do the world any favor by adopting a clearly nonstandard
> notation as part of our standard operator set.
Now that someone else thinks this is a good idea, I have added to the
TODO list:
* Allow plug-in modules to emulate features from other databases
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026