On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 01:12:45AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> It'd theoretically be possible to support Lisp in the same way as we
> currently support Tcl, Perl, etc. The hard part is to find a suitable
> interpreter that is designed to be dynamically linked into other
> applications. Perl still hasn't got that quite right, and I imagine
> it's an even more foreign idea for most Lisp systems...
librep for emacs-like-lisp and I remember seeing couple of
Scheme libs too (guile, cant remember more ATM) Not that I
have looked them closely.
--
marko