well, now i wish we hadn't gutted the ipv6 support

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Paul A Vixie
Тема well, now i wish we hadn't gutted the ipv6 support
Дата
Msg-id 200104211727.KAA12640@redpaul.mfnx.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: well, now i wish we hadn't gutted the ipv6 support  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
my original CIDR type implementation used BIND's inet_ntop() and inet_pton()
which therefore included latent support for ipv6.  it wouldn't take a huge
amount of effort to bring this back, would it?

(the user below is using VARCHAR for his ip addresses for this reason.)

------- Forwarded Message

Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 08:37:22 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200104201537.IAA26178@gulag.araneus.fi>
To: Paul A Vixie <vixie@mfnx.net>
Subject: Re: Appliance caching server configuration database schema 
In-Reply-To: <200104200314.UAA73417@redpaul.mfnx.net>
From: gson@nominum.com (Andreas Gustafsson)

Paul A. Vixie writes:
> you can use INET or CIDR for your addresses since this is postgres.

I would if it supported IPv6 addresses.

------- End of Forwarded Message



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: setuid(geteuid());?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: well, now i wish we hadn't gutted the ipv6 support