Re: RE: Compiling

On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 07:54:15AM +1000, Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote:
> Well Peter, I must say many would disagree with you there ;)

* NSHO about ant deleted *

> 3) currently we seem to have a build process that is 99% Ant and 1% make
> (for 4 substitutions). It seems unnecessarily complex to add make when we
> can remove it completely and not lose any functionality.

Peter E, Peter M: how about build.xml.in, where the needed
substitutions are done in configure end-phase?  I can prepare
patch if this is acceptable.

--
marko