Re: AW: WAL & RC1 status

> Zeugswetter Andreas SB  <ZeugswetterA@Wien.Spardat.at> writes:
> >> At least one of my concerns (single point of failure) would require a
> >> change to the layout of pg_control, which would force initdb anyway.
> 
> > Was that the "only one checkpoint back in time in pg_control" issue ?
> 
> Yes.

Is changing pg_control the thing that is going to require the initdb?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026