Re: Re: WAL and commit_delay

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jan Wieck
Тема Re: Re: WAL and commit_delay
Дата
Msg-id 200102191947.OAA01924@jupiter.jw.home
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Re: WAL and commit_delay  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Adriaan Joubert <a.joubert@albourne.com> writes:
> > fdatasync() is available on Tru64 and according to the man-page behaves
> > as Tom expects. So it should be a win for us.
>
> Careful ... HPUX's man page also claims that fdatasync does something
> useful, but it doesn't.  I'd recommend an experiment.  Does today's
> snapshot run any faster for you (without -F) than before?
   IIRC  your  HPUX manpage states that fdatasync() updates only   required information to find back the data. It
soundedto  me   that  HPUX  distinguishes between irrelevant inode info (like   modtime) and important things (like
blocks).
   But maybe I'm confused by HP and they can still tell me an  X   for an U.


Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #



_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: GET DIAGNOSTICS (was Re: Open 7.1 items)
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: GET DIAGNOSTICS (was Re: Open 7.1 items)