> > Removal seemed to obvious to discuss, I guess, and when I got on OK, I
> > was on my way.
>
> Since you obvious had to have had some sort of discussion and approval
> (especially after all that you and I have discussed) for the original
> patch, a similar discussion and approval should have been attained for
> removing it ... someone had to have liked the original patch to have given
> you the go-ahead on it, right?
I am confused. The Hiroshi point was the <=6.3 compatibility code
removal. That was never submitted as a patch. If you are referring to
that one, it was added back in the 6.4 days, I guess, but obviously has
little use now that we are on 7.1.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026