Re: Small patch to replace 'idle' by 'trans' if transaction is still open

> On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> >
> > Seems we decided against this.  Sorry.
>
> Huh?  from reading Tom's response, sounds like it would be something
> useful?  I know I find having as much information about state in the ps
> listing helps me alot, and knowing if its 'idle' vs 'idle (in
> transaction)' provides at lesat more detailed information then just 'idle'

> Who was the 'we' in the above decision?  Tom seemed in favor of it, I know
> I'm in favor of it .. and you are not in favor of it ...

There must have been some discussion about it.  I don't see it in the
code, and I remember it was rejected for some reason.  Check the archives.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026