Tom,
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 11:19:10AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jason Tishler <Jason.Tishler@dothill.com> writes:
> >> That does not look like a bug;
>
> > My point was that the error message generated by the second postmaster
> > is *different* that the one generated for the same test case on a real
> > UNIX (i.e., Linux) platform.
>
> It is? I get exactly that message (modulo the obvious path and PID
> differences) when I try it. Are you comparing to 7.0.* on Linux
> perhaps? IIRC, 7.0 makes these tests in a different order than 7.1
> does.
Bingo! I *am* (still) using 7.0.3 on Linux. I assumed that this aspect
would not have changed between 7.0.3 and 7.1. There I go getting myself
in trouble again by assuming...
Thanks,
Jason
--
Jason Tishler
Director, Software Engineering Phone: +1 (732) 264-8770 x235
Dot Hill Systems Corp. Fax: +1 (732) 264-8798
82 Bethany Road, Suite 7 Email: Jason.Tishler@dothill.com
Hazlet, NJ 07730 USA WWW: http://www.dothill.com