Re: Why vacuum?
| От | Alfred Perlstein |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Why vacuum? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20001213190923.E16205@fw.wintelcom.net обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Why vacuum? ("xuyifeng" <xyf@stocke.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
* xuyifeng <xyf@stocke.com> [001213 18:54] wrote: > I have this nasty problem too, in early time, I don't know the problem, but we used it for a while, > than we found our table growing too fast without insert any record( we use update), this behaviour > most like M$ MSACCESS database I had used a long time ago which don't reuse deleted record > space and full fill your hard disk after several hours, the nasty vaccum block any other users to operate > on table, this is a big problem for a large table, because it will block tooo long to let other user to run > query. we have a project affected by this problem, and sadly we decide to use closure source database > - SYBASE on linux, we havn't any other selections. :( > > note that SYBASE and Informix both have 'update statistics' command, but they run it fast in seconds, > not block any other user, this is pretty. ya, what's good technology! http://people.freebsd.org/~alfred/vacfix/ -Alfred
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: