Re: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language namesh
| От | 'Marko Kreen' |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language namesh |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20001116175107.A8900@l-t.ee обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language namesh ("Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language
namesh
Re: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language namesh |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 09:32:43AM -0600, Ross J. Reedstrom wrote: > On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 04:16:26PM +1100, Philip Warner wrote: > > Create Module foo_mod from library 'path-to-lib'; > > Phil - be careful with the nomenclature. We've got another naming collision, > here. SQL9[29] talk about modules, which may or may not be related to what > your suggesting here. Do you know any url's where the SQL* standards could be looked up? Mark Hollomon's idea was to use 'package' not 'module', but ofcourse it would be nice to be SQL* conforming. -- marko
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: