Re: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language names

On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 02:42:24PM +0100, Zeugswetter Andreas SB wrote:
> 
> > > We need the 7.0 style for compatibility with other DB's. Postgres was 
> > > "the" pioneer in this area, but similar functionality is now available in other DB's.
> > 
> > Could you explain?  PostgreSQL cant be compatible in C level, why
> > the SQL compatibility?  (I mean the LANGUAGE 'C' specifically)
> 
> C code compatible with Informix:
> 
> int32 intadd (int32 a, int32 b)
> {
>     return a + b;
> }
> 
> This is the same code that was standard in PostgreSQL 7.0

Hmm, I have not actually researched if 7.1 supports 7.0 'C' code
or not.  Butthe 'newC' is anyway incompatible with 'C'. So:

* CREATE FUNCTION .. AS 'foo.so', .. LANGUAGE 'C';
 creates the old¬ 'C', 7.0 and ifnormix compatible funtion.
 And it is documented as deprecated, for-compatibility.

* CREATE FUNCTION .. FROM LIBRARY 'foo.so.2' ..{name in .so} [WITH VERSION abi_ver]    {the actual syntax needs
polishing}
 creates by default the newC style fn's but WITH VERSION 0 (e.g.) you can create the old style functions too.

Comments?

-- 
marko