Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1
| От | selkovjr@mcs.anl.gov |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200011100523.XAA17020@selkovjr.xnet.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1 (Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects
inherited from template1
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Philip Warner wrote: > I think both this and the OID-wrap problem will be permanent features until > we have a non-oid-based dump procedure. Pretty much every piece of metadata > needs some kind of 'I am a system object, don't dump me' flag. Curiously enough, Philip, you seem to have been ahead of me by just a few keystrokes, so I didn't read your observation until I sent mine. > Relying of values of numeric OIDs is definitely clunky, but it's all we can > do at the moment. I held that one up, but now I am wondering: would checking a "don't dump me" flag involve any more code or or would it be any more difficult than the current (oid > n)? Seems like a straightforward change to me, so what's the reason for this "all we can do" sentiment? --Gene
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: