Backend touches index not involved in update / NULL indexing

Doug Mitchell (pgsql@dougmitchell.com) reports a bug with a severity of 3
The lower the number the more severe it is.

Short Description
Backend touches index not involved in update / NULL indexing

Long Description
I had some updates that were taking a few seconds each on a primary-keyed table with a few million records.  I dropped
anindex on a field not involved in the query and the updates now run several times faster. 

Idea:  The non-involved field which was indexed with a btree has a lot of NULLs in it.  The btree node with the NULLs
(severalmillion records) had to be processed thus slowing performance.  Please provide and document a way to turn
on/offthe indexing of NULL values. 

Either way, PG should not have to update the index in the first place,
because it indexes a field which is not part of the SET or WHERE in the UPDATE statement.

Thanks,
Doug

Sample Code


No file was uploaded with this report