Re: Now 376175 lines of code

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: Now 376175 lines of code
Дата
Msg-id 200010200129.VAA00511@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Now 376175 lines of code  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Now 376175 lines of code  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
FYI, it is 376k lines of C code, not bytes.

[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> What is amazing, is that you can make such complete system on Linux with
> only 376k of code... 
> 
> I think bloated software is not part of your dictionnary, and that's good...
> 
> Franck Martin
> Database Development Officer
> SOPAC South Pacific Applied Geoscience Commission
> Fiji
> E-mail: franck@sopac.org <mailto:franck@sopac.org> 
> Web site: http://www.sopac.org/ <http://www.sopac.org/> 
> 
> This e-mail is intended for its recipients only. Do not forward this
> e-mail without approval. The views expressed in this e-mail may not be
> neccessarily the views of SOPAC.
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@candle.pha.pa.us]
> Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 1:03 PM
> To: Ross J. Reedstrom
> Cc: Tom Lane; PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Now 376175 lines of code
> 
> 
> Never mind.  I see I ran it already on 7.0 and got 376k.  You used my
> idential script to get these numbers.  I will use your nice numbers for
> a presentation at the show in two weeks.  Thanks a lot.
> 
> 
> 
> > On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 01:45:31AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > > > I did a distclean on 7.0, and ran 'wc' on all the *.[chly] files, and
> > > > got a much larger number than what we got from Berkeley.
> > > >     376175
> > > > Seems someone has been busy.  :-)
> > > 
> > > Forgive a newbie --- what was the count for the original Berkeley code?
> > > Do you have the same numbers for other milestones?
> > 
> > Not that I'm a big believer in kloc as a measure of productivity (oh,
> > Bruce just said busy, didn't he? That's a different story...), I happen
> > to have a couple historical trees laying around, starting with the last
> > one I found at Berkeley:
> > 
> >   postgres-v4r2           244581
> >   postgres95-1.09         178976
> >   postgresql-6.1.1        200709
> >   postgresql-6.3.2        260809
> >   postgresql-6.4.0        297479
> >   postgresql-6.4.2        297918
> >   postgresql-6.5.3        331278   
> > 
> > Well, more than a couple trees, I guess (actually I unpacked tarballs
> > for most of these)
> > 
> > HTH,
> > Ross
> > -- 
> > Ross J. Reedstrom, Ph.D., <reedstrm@rice.edu> 
> > NSBRI Research Scientist/Programmer
> > Computer and Information Technology Institute
> > Rice University, 6100 S. Main St.,  Houston, TX 77005
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
>   Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
>   pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
>   +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
>   +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
> 


--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Now 376175 lines of code
Следующее
От: Thomas Lockhart
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: pg_dump docs