> You'll probably recall that the ambiguity between NOT NULL and NOT
> DEFERRABLE gave us similar problems. We were able to get around that
> by pretending NOT DEFERRABLE is an independent clause and leaving some
> of the parsing work to be done by analyze.c, but I don't think that
> trick will work here.
>
> I seem to recall a third case where a lookahead would have helped,
> but can't find the details in the archives right now.
>
> I think it's time to bite the bullet and put in a lookahead filter.
> What say you?
Hmmm. Not real excited about that for performance reasons. Other options?
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026