Marc -
If you're going to consider a point release, should we try to collect up
any other small patches that would go cleanly into the 7.0 tree? Just for
instance, the revised view rule name truncation patch I posted to PATCHES
that no one has commented on, yeah or neah. I don't think there are very
many of these: it seems to me that most small fixes that could be patched
to both trees, have been, but I haven't been trying to keep an accurate
count. (Hmm, Bruce's has been quiet this week. Is he on vacation?)
Ross
On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 12:06:38AM -0300, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
> > > On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
> > >> I have committed a fix into REL7_0 branch. Although it seems to work,
> > >> I don't trust it really far because it depends on heap_markpos() and
> > >> heap_restrpos(), which haven't been used in a long time and are full
> > >> of alarmed-sounding comments.
> >
>
> Thanks for the backpatch ...:)
>
>
--
Ross J. Reedstrom, Ph.D., <reedstrm@rice.edu>
NSBRI Research Scientist/Programmer
Computer and Information Technology Institute
Rice University, 6100 S. Main St., Houston, TX 77005