Re: Re: postgres TODO

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От JanWieck@t-online.de (Jan Wieck)
Тема Re: Re: postgres TODO
Дата
Msg-id 200007120905.LAA23261@hot.jw.home
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Re: postgres TODO  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Re: postgres TODO  (Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Philip's INSERT ... RETURNING idea could support returning TID and
> table OID as a special case, and it has the saving grace that it
> won't affect apps that don't use it...
   I  like  that one alot more too. It should be relatively easy   to add a list of attributes (specified  after
RETURNING) to   the  querytree.  Then send out a regular result set of tuples   built from the requested attributes  of
the  new  tuple  (at   INSERT/UPDATE) or the old one (at DELETE) during the executor   run.  Or  maybe  both  and
specified as   NEW.attname   vs.   OLD.attnam?  Then  it needs AS too, making the attribute list   looking like a
targetlistrestricted to Var nodes.
 
   This doesn't require any changes in the FE/BE protocol. And a   client  using this new feature just expects
TUPLES_OKinstead   of COMMAND_OK when using the new functionality.
 


Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Zeugswetter Andreas SB
Дата:
Сообщение: AW: update on TOAST status'
Следующее
От: Pavel.Janik@linux.cz (Pavel Janík ml.)
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Distribution making