Re: Slashdot discussion
| От | eschmid+sic@s.netic.de |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Slashdot discussion |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20000711015549.60820@s.netic.de обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Slashdot discussion (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Slashdot discussion
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 08:40:27PM -0300, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, Graeme Merrall wrote:
>
> >
> > > Is anyone else noticing this: Everytime this sort of thing comes up a
> > > number of people invariably tell that they are using MySQL because it's
> > > easier to install, and that PostgreSQL is difficult ("a pain") to install.
> > >
> > > I've studied the MySQL installation instructions, and they don't strike me
> > > as inherently simpler. Is it only perception, or what can we do better?
> > Possibly because for most people the process is a simple './configure;
> > make; make install'
> >
> > Pgsql doesn't do this. Not the install process is any less better but
>
> huh? all i do is './configure;make;make install' ...
And what about CVS?
bash-2.01$ cd ../pgsql
bash-2.01$ cvs -z9 update -dP
cvs [update aborted]: authorization failed: server postgresql.org rejected
access
bash-2.01$
-Egon
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: