> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Some unhappiness was raised about
> > depending on symlinks for this function, but I didn't hear one single
> > concrete reason not to do it, nor an alternative design.
>
> Are symlinks portable?
Sure, and if the system loading it can not create the required symlinks
because the directories don't exist, it can just skip the symlink step.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026