I found these numbers quite interesting.
> On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 01:45:31AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > > I did a distclean on 7.0, and ran 'wc' on all the *.[chly] files, and
> > > got a much larger number than what we got from Berkeley.
> > > 376175
> > > Seems someone has been busy. :-)
> >
> > Forgive a newbie --- what was the count for the original Berkeley code?
> > Do you have the same numbers for other milestones?
>
> Not that I'm a big believer in kloc as a measure of productivity (oh,
> Bruce just said busy, didn't he? That's a different story...), I happen
> to have a couple historical trees laying around, starting with the last
> one I found at Berkeley:
>
> postgres-v4r2 244581
> postgres95-1.09 178976
> postgresql-6.1.1 200709
> postgresql-6.3.2 260809
> postgresql-6.4.0 297479
> postgresql-6.4.2 297918
> postgresql-6.5.3 331278
>
> Well, more than a couple trees, I guess (actually I unpacked tarballs
> for most of these)
>
> HTH,
> Ross
> --
> Ross J. Reedstrom, Ph.D., <reedstrm@rice.edu>
> NSBRI Research Scientist/Programmer
> Computer and Information Technology Institute
> Rice University, 6100 S. Main St., Houston, TX 77005
>
-- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026