Re: Odd release numbers for development versions?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: Odd release numbers for development versions?
Дата
Msg-id 200006061607.MAA27510@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Odd release numbers for development versions?  ("Robert B. Easter" <reaster@comptechnews.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> Is PostgreSQL going to start using odd release numbers for development
> versions?  This is how the Linux kernel is, and some other projects.
> 
> Version.release.revision/build
> 
> Like 7.0.x would be the current stable branch. 7.1.x, the current development
> branch.  The next stable branch would be 7.2.x.  Within the current even
> release stable branch, maybe only do bug fixes.  In the odd dev releases, focus
> on new/experiemental.  Both branches could have very frequent *.x
> revisions/builds.  I guess you'd have to apply patches to both branches
> sometimes, like when a bug is found in 7.0.x, it is patched and the same patch
> applied to the 7.1.x if needed.
> 
> This way there would be a clear distinction for users what is likely to be good
> for production use and what is still unproven.

No even/odd mess.  Every release is stable.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PGPORT ignored ?
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Commit messages list