Re: [HACKERS] sqgfault on initdb with current CVS

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ross J. Reedstrom
Тема Re: [HACKERS] sqgfault on initdb with current CVS
Дата
Msg-id 20000306230443.A14691@rice.edu
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] sqgfault on initdb with current CVS  (Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 07, 2000 at 10:07:16AM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> > Sorry about the length of this one, but I wanted to include backtrace
> > info.  I've been getting a segfault when I try to setup a test version
> > of the current CVS tree, to run along beside a 'production' 6.5.X server.
> > 
> > This is how I've configured it:
> > 
> > wallace$./configure --prefix=/usr/local/pgsql7.0/ --with-pgport=6666 --enable-debug
> 
> For some reason, current does not seem to allow "." in the
> $PGDATA. I'm no sure why this happens at all. I guess it intends to
> inhibit "./" or "../" for a security reason? If so, that would be
> apparently an overkill.

Thank you very much, Ishii-san, changing it to pgsql70 worked! If your ever in Houston,
I owe you a beer!

Ross
-- 
Ross J. Reedstrom, Ph.D., <reedstrm@rice.edu> 
NSBRI Research Scientist/Programmer
Computer and Information Technology Institute
Rice University, 6100 S. Main St.,  Houston, TX 77005


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for Grand Unified Configuration scheme
Следующее
От: Thomas Lockhart
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] sqgfault on initdb with current CVS