> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > On 2000-02-20, Tom Lane mentioned:
> >> I would not like us to stop working
> >> with non-bison yaccs, since bison's output depends on alloca() which
> >> is not available everywhere.
>
> > Couldn't alloca(x) be defined to palloc(x) where missing?
>
> Probably, but I wasn't looking for a workaround; that was just one
> quick illustration of a reason not to want to use bison (one that's
> bitten me personally, so I knew it offhand). We should try not to
> become dependent on bison when there are near-equivalent tools, just
> on general principles of maintaining portability. For an analogy,
> I believe most of the developers use gcc, but it would be a real bad
> idea for us to abandon support for other compilers.
But I don't see non-bison solutions for finding the location of errors.
Is it possible? Could we enable the feature just for bison?
-- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026