Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level ?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level ?
Дата
Msg-id 200002190205.VAA24822@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level ?  (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> > I got the impression from the paragraph that followed that we don't
> > and the first query I tried bounced from commandline
> > So assumed it was handled in psql when in interactive mode.
> 
> Yuck. They *were* talking about InterBase, but you're right!
> 
> Didn't realize that scan.l had lost (or never did have) the right
> stuff. Will be fixed before we're out of beta...

Can you give me a failure condition for the TODO list?  I can't see the
bug here.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Thomas Lockhart
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level ?
Следующее
От: Thomas Lockhart
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level?