Re: [HACKERS] Patch attached...

> >*) The overhead for non-inheritance has
> >been cut down to 30 microseconds (on a pc).

We actually have to see how you have implemented it.  I am not so
interested in timings as in your method.  It can be done fast, or it can
be done sloppy.   I will check the patch.

> And if SQL92 compliance is the goal, why must ANY degradation
> of performance be acceptable unless there are very, very strong
> reasons to do so (reasons that impact the target audience).

Agreed.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026