Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL
Дата
Msg-id 200002031326.IAA22002@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL  (Chris <chris@bitmead.com>)
Список pgsql-sql
> > Let me add that to the TODO list.
> 
> Why not change that to a relnumindexes as well? Easier to maintain and
> more useful information.

Yes, we probably should do that, but I bet some interfaces us it. 
Comments?

Actually, looks like only pg_dump uses it, so maybe we would be OK.
Maybe 7.0 is a good time to fix this.

> 
> > > >Could you do that for relhassubclass?
> > >
> > > If we made it relnumsubclasses and incremented/decremented on
> > > CREATE/DROP, it seems easy in theory.
> > 
> > Yes, that would work.  Seems hasindex has problems.
> 
> ************
> 
> 


--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Chris
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL
Следующее
От: "Mark Hollomon"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL