Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem
Дата
Msg-id 200002010154.UAA21581@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> I am starting to think that Bruce's idea might be the way to go: lock
> down any cache entry that's been referenced since the last transaction
> start or CommandCounterIncrement, and elog() if it's changed by
> invalidation.  Then the only coding rule needed is "cached tuples don't
> stay valid across CommandCounterIncrement", which is relatively
> simple to check for.

Yea, I had a good idea ...

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Philip Warner
Дата:
Сообщение: The Apache Model (was Re: Copyright)
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!?