Re: [HACKERS] Copyright

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Copyright
Дата
Msg-id 200001281837.NAA00971@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Copyright  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Copyright  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: [HACKERS] Copyright  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
[Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> This came down with my latest update and confused me quite a bit:
> 
> * Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2000, PostgreSQL, Inc
> 
> Since when do *they* own the copyright? Whatever happened to the good old
> PostgreSQL Global Development Group? Assigning the copyright of an open
> source project to a commercial entity is something unprecedented, and
> quite frankly (without having anything at all against PostgreSQL, Inc) I
> am not so excited about it.

That is what I was told by Marc.  If we want to discuss it, go ahead. 
Such a change was planned in late December, though there was no
discussion who gets the copyright.  I believe he used PostgreSQL Inc.
because it is a legal entity, vs. the development team, which is not.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Hannu Krosing
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] OO and tuples of different types
Следующее
От: Ed Loehr
Дата:
Сообщение: [HACKERS] Trigger drop/create bug?