Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone?

On Wed, Jan 19, 2000 at 12:38:18AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> is, I'm sure the parser/scanner speed is the least of our problems. But I
> thunk especially ecpg could benefit from this. Btw., gperf is used by GCC,

Why do you think ecpg would benefit more from it than the backend? :-)
Both parser are mostly the same. In fact running ecpg appears to use a lot
less time than the subsequent gcc run.

Michael
-- 
Michael Meskes                         | Go SF 49ers!
Th.-Heuss-Str. 61, D-41812 Erkelenz    | Go Rhein Fire!
Tel.: (+49) 2431/72651                 | Use Debian GNU/Linux!
Email: Michael@Fam-Meskes.De           | Use PostgreSQL!