Re: [HACKERS] INDEX_MAX_KEYS and pg_dump

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [HACKERS] INDEX_MAX_KEYS and pg_dump
Дата
Msg-id 200001160540.AAA08665@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] INDEX_MAX_KEYS and pg_dump  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> >> descriptions. However, I believe pg_dump is currently in a
> >> broken state with respect to the dumping of indexes,
> >> possibly related to the current work done with
> >> INDEX_MAX_KEYS. Can anyone confirm this?
> 
> > I just looked and I don't see any problems.
> 
> It was broken --- I committed fixes for it at about 11PM EST.
> 
> (The same problem as for func args --- it wasn't coping with
> zero suppression in oidvectorout/int2vectorout.)

Thanks.  I missed that.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] I think we need an explicit parsetree node for CAST
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] I think we need an explicit parsetree node for CAST