Re: [GENERAL] identifying performance hits: how to ???
От | Jim Mercer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] identifying performance hits: how to ??? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20000112115502.U4188@reptiles.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] identifying performance hits: how to ??? (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] identifying performance hits: how to ???
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Jan 12, 2000 at 12:23:23PM -0400, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > Have/do you perform reasonably regular vacuum's of the database? on my databases, i have only been successful in doing a "VACUUM VERBOSE" on my tables. i suspect i've got the syntax wrong or something: nagoss=> \h vacuum Command: vacuum Description: vacuum the database, i.e. cleans out deleted records, updates statistics Syntax: VACUUM [VERBOSE] [ANALYZE] [table] or VACUUM [VERBOSE] ANALYZE [table [(attr1, ...attrN)]]; nagoss=> vacuum verbose analyse switches; ERROR: parser: parse error at or near "switches" nagoss=> vacuum verbose switches; NOTICE: --Relation switches-- NOTICE: Pages 1: Changed 1, Reapped 0, Empty 0, New 0; Tup 9: Vac 0, Keep/VTL 0/0, Crash 0, UnUsed 0, MinLen 78, MaxLen78; Re-using: Free/Avail. Space 0/0; EndEmpty/Avail. Pages 0/0. Elapsed 0/0 sec. NOTICE: Index switch_name: Pages 2; Tuples 9. Elapsed 0/0 sec. VACUUM what is the correct syntax for doing a vacuum analyse? -- [ Jim Mercer jim@reptiles.org +1 416 506-0654 ] [ Reptilian Research -- Longer Life through Colder Blood ] [ Don't be fooled by cheap Finnish imitations; BSD is the One True Code. ]
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: