> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> >> You may have gotten confused because fmgr.c allowed 9 args to be passed,
> >> even though there's no way to declare such a function; I think this was
> >> a hack to support some special system usage --- possibly selectivity
> >
> > btbuild, I believe.
>
> Ah, you are right (it just blew up on me when I tried it at eight ;-)).
>
> >> But if we are going to
> >> increase the default MAX_ARGS above 8 then the issue goes away anyway,
> >> and there's no need for fmgr.c to support more args than can normally
> >> be declared.
>
> This still holds though --- we will just require INDEX_MAX_ARGS to be
> at least 9 from here on out...
But it bombs on 16.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026