Re: [HACKERS] Shared library version

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Meskes
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Shared library version
Дата
Msg-id 20000110211817.A2212@fam-meskes.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Shared library version  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 10, 2000 at 10:22:44AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> You're right, we need to bump the number before release (and I hope we
> remember!).  Past practice has not been to bump the number during
> development cycles, since we'd shortly have ridiculously high version
> numbers if we incremented them at every development change.

Ehem... I do exactly that with libecpg. For simply changes not involving API
changes I increment just the patch level. That's why libecpg has major
version, minor version and patchlevel. 

I find it very difficult to keep track of the changes without changing
version number.

So please, do not change this number upon release.

Michael
-- 
Michael Meskes                         | Go SF 49ers!
Th.-Heuss-Str. 61, D-41812 Erkelenz    | Go Rhein Fire!
Tel.: (+49) 2431/72651                 | Use Debian GNU/Linux!
Email: Michael@Fam-Meskes.De           | Use PostgreSQL!


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: INDEX_MAX_KEYS = 16 ... it works, too
Следующее
От: "Oliver Elphick"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Shared library version