Re: [GENERAL] What is "large"
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [GENERAL] What is "large" |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200001050551.AAA06444@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | What is "large" ("Sean Carmody" <sean@categoricalsolutions.com.au>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...] > Just out of curiosity: > > I've noticed a number of exchanges on various PostgreSQL mailing lists along > the lines of > > Original posting: > > ... we are using a large database: tables having X number of rows ... > > Reply: > ... that's not a large database! ;) ... > > Would a table with around 6,000,000 records (each with, say, 4 fields) be > considered "large" for PostgreSQL? Databases and tables of > 10 Gig would be large. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: