[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> Just out of curiosity:
>
> I've noticed a number of exchanges on various PostgreSQL mailing lists along
> the lines of
>
> Original posting:
> > ... we are using a large database: tables having X number of rows ...
>
> Reply:
> ... that's not a large database! ;) ...
>
> Would a table with around 6,000,000 records (each with, say, 4 fields) be
> considered "large" for PostgreSQL?
Databases and tables of > 10 Gig would be large.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026