Re: pg_restore should accept multiple -t switches?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Erik Rijkers
Тема Re: pg_restore should accept multiple -t switches?
Дата
Msg-id 1f74c7cb3b4bdcd668d03ab789f1b242.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_restore should accept multiple -t switches?  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, August 10, 2010 13:18, David Fetter wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 05:13:22PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>
>> Is it worth allowing pg_restore to accept multiple -t
>> switches as well as pg_dump?
>>
>>     $ pg_restore -t tbl1 -t tbl2 db.dump
>>
>> Regards,
>
> Yes. :)
>
> What other functionality in pg_dump does pg_restore not duplicate?
>

See also "pg_restore -t table : can silently omit constraints":
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2009-04/msg00269.php




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: David Fetter
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_restore should accept multiple -t switches?
Следующее
От: "Kevin Grittner"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: host name support in pg_hba.conf