Re: consistently use "ProcSignal" instead of "procsignal" in code comments

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Fujii Masao
Тема Re: consistently use "ProcSignal" instead of "procsignal" in code comments
Дата
Msg-id 1f4d16ff-27c0-893e-0b17-5534d1f1d960@oss.nttdata.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на consistently use "ProcSignal" instead of "procsignal" in code comments  (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: consistently use "ProcSignal" instead of "procsignal" in code comments  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 

On 2021/11/05 14:52, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I see that "procsignal" and "ProcSignal" are being used in the code
> comments which look inconsistent. IMO, "ProcSignal" is the right word
> to use and let's be consistent across the code comments. Attaching a
> tiny patch for that.
> 
> Thoughts?

I'm fine with this. Barring any objection, I will commit the patch.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Fujii Masao
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] pg_stat_statements Configuration Parameters Documentation
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: consistently use "ProcSignal" instead of "procsignal" in code comments