Re: Replace current implementations in crypt() and gen_salt() to OpenSSL
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Replace current implementations in crypt() and gen_salt() to OpenSSL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1f32ff67-255d-4c0c-8433-c8c721842aa3@eisentraut.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Replace current implementations in crypt() and gen_salt() to OpenSSL ("Koshi Shibagaki (Fujitsu)" <shibagaki.koshi@fujitsu.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 09.12.24 22:37, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >> On 9 Dec 2024, at 15:11, Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> wrote: >> >> On 12/9/24 07:23, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >>>> On 4 Dec 2024, at 16:57, Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> wrote: >>>> I can send you the source RPM for openssl 1.1.1c which was an earlier FIPS validated version, but the main FIPS patchcontains: >>> AFAICT the forks of 1.1.1 which offer FIPS certification all patch the common >>> OpenSSL API FIPS_mode() rather than invent a new one, so the earlier approach >>> should work fine. PFA an updated version which I propose we go ahead with. >> >> That sounds correct from my memory of it. >> >> I have not done any actual testing (yet), but on quick scan this part looks suspicious: > > Not only suspicious but plain wrong, fixed in the attached, thanks! I think these function names are wrong: + <varname>pgcrypto.legacy_crypto_enabled</varname> determines if the + built in legacy crypto functions <literal>pg_gen_salt</literal>, + <literal>pg_gen_salt_rounds</literal>, and <literal>pg_crypt</literal> + are available for use. Those are the C-level functions. The SQL-level functions are called gen_salt and crypt.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: