Re: [HACKERS] Increase pltcl test coverage

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jim Nasby
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Increase pltcl test coverage
Дата
Msg-id 1f13802c-df1e-c998-09dc-1161c494e8d9@BlueTreble.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Increase pltcl test coverage  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Increase pltcl test coverage  (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 1/9/17 1:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>> Pushed with that and some other, mostly-cosmetic changes.
>
> Hmm, looks like the new test cases have turned up a pre-existing bug.
> Some of the buildfarm is showing crashes :-(.  It looks like all the
> unhappy critters are running Tcl 8.4.something, which might be a
> coincidence but I bet not.
>
> I get the impression it's a stack clobber or memory clobber associated
> with reporting Tcl errors back to PG, but haven't been able to isolate
> it yet.

I notice the failures are also on "unusual" platforms, with only 1 being 
x86. Though, that's very possibly the only animals running 8.4...

I'm compiling 8.4 now, will see if I can duplicate.
-- 
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Incorrect XLogRegisterBuffer flag for revmapbuf in brin
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] proposal: session server side variables