Re: Update Unicode data to Unicode 16.0.0
От | Jeff Davis |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Update Unicode data to Unicode 16.0.0 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1e1f69da35419af44bdd85d3e94cd44fa0d38ca5.camel@j-davis.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Update Unicode data to Unicode 16.0.0 (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Update Unicode data to Unicode 16.0.0
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2025-03-19 at 14:33 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > I strongly believe users want to control what happens, not have > the system try to fix it for them automatically without their > knowledge. Do you have a sketch of what the ideal Unicode version management experience might look like? Very high level, like "this is what happens by default during an upgrade" and "this is how a user discovers that that they might want to update Uniocde", etc. What ways can/should we nudge users to update more quickly, if at all, so that they are less likely to have problems with newly-assigned code points? And, if possible, how we might extend this user experience to libc or ICU updates? Regards, Jeff Davis
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: