Re: Wal receiver process listens to physical IP

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Laurenz Albe
Тема Re: Wal receiver process listens to physical IP
Дата
Msg-id 1dd417aa285601172a5750354479d209500037aa.camel@cybertec.at
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Wal receiver process listens to physical IP  (Mariya Rampurawala <Mariya.Rampurawala@veritas.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On Fri, 2020-03-20 at 11:27 +0000, Mariya Rampurawala wrote:
> I have been working on a project where I need to virtualize the postgresql standby server.
> The wal receiver process listens to the Physical IP and a random port.
> How can I configure it to listen to a VIP that the wal sender process can connect to?
> Also, Is there a way I can configure the port number for this?
> 
> $ /usr/pgsql-12/bin/postgres -V
> postgres (PostgreSQL) 12.2
> 
> postgresql.conf:
> listen_addresses = '10.209.57.17'   This is the VIP
> 
> $ ps -ef | grep post
> postgres  2945     1  0 05:37 ?        00:00:00 /usr/pgsql-12/bin/postgres -D /pg_mnt/pg-12/data -h 10.209.57.17
> postgres  2946  2945  0 05:37 ?        00:00:00 postgres: logger   
> postgres  2947  2945  0 05:37 ?        00:00:00 postgres: startup   recovering 000000010000000000000007
> postgres  2952  2945  0 05:37 ?        00:00:00 postgres: checkpointer   
> postgres  2953  2945  0 05:37 ?        00:00:00 postgres: background writer   
> postgres  2954  2945  0 05:37 ?        00:00:00 postgres: stats collector   
> postgres  2955  2945  0 05:37 ?        00:00:04 postgres: walreceiver   
> 
> $ netstat -anp | grep 55656
> tcp        0      0 10.209.57.15:55656      10.209.57.16:5432       ESTABLISHED 2955/postgres: walr 
> 
> 10.209.57.15 is the physical IP
> 
> $ ps -ef | grep 2955
> postgres  2955  2945  0 05:37 ?        00:00:04 postgres: walreceiver 

The standby is *listening* on 10.209.57.17 for connections, but
the WAL receiver is not listening, it actively connects to the primary
server.  Obviously it is using the other network interface.

To change that, you would have to change the network route to the primary
server to lead through the virtual interface.
But I don't see any reason to do that.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe
-- 
Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com




В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: rob stone
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Could postgres12 support millions of sequences? (like 10million)
Следующее
От: Laurenz Albe
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Partition by hash formula