Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Joshua D. Drake
Тема Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)
Дата
Msg-id 1d5946a3-aa85-a3ec-c8aa-b3e9b66dd5d9@commandprompt.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 08/21/2018 11:06 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
>
> XP at least is essentially a dead platform for us. My animals are not 
> able to build anything after release 10.

I wouldn't think XP should even be on our list anymore. Microsoft hasn't 
supported it in 4 years.

JD

-- 
Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc
***  A fault and talent of mine is to tell it exactly how it is.  ***
PostgreSQL centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Learn: https://postgresconf.org
*****     Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own.   *****



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)