Re: [bugfix] DISCARD ALL does not release advisory locks

On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 9:45 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Well, the *first* sentence there says it "resets the session to its
> initial state", so it seems to me the intent is clear.  But maybe we
> should alter the second sentence to read, say, "This _currently_ has the
> same effect as ...", thereby making it clear that this is implementation
> detail and not the controlling definition.

+1.

-- 
Guillaume