On Jan 27, 2008 9:07 PM, Markus Bertheau <mbertheau.pg@googlemail.com> wrote:
> 2008/1/28, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
> >
> > Do we have nominations for a name? The first idea that comes to mind
> > is "synchronized_scanning" (defaulting to ON).
>
> "synchronized_sequential_scans" is a bit long, but contains the
> keyword "sequential scans", which will ring a bell with many, more so
> than "synchronized_scanning".
synchronize_seqscans?