On 2/15/07, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I think that the
> answer is probably "because the index is lossy for this operator,
> so it has to be checked even if the bitmap didn't become lossy".
> You'd have to check the GIST opclass definition to be sure.
Any idea on what I have to look for (if it's of any interest for
anyone, otherwise, I can live with your answer)?
Thanks.
--
Guillaume