On 8/27/06, Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> I'm beginning to wonder whether it would be better from a PR perspective to
> rename pgfoundry to something like modules.postgresql.org. While "modules"
> isn't necessarily technically right in postgresql vocabulary it's right in the
> more general sense
>
> And it doesn't imply the pieces of code are still in progress like
> "projects.postgresql.org" might and doesn't give the impression that they're
> living on their own without support from other postgres people like having a
> separate domain does.
I don't know what the name should be but we should at least be
consistent between pgFoundry and websites hosted on pgFoundry.
Currently we have http://pgcluster.projects.postgresql.org/ for the
website hosted on pgFoundry and
http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pgcluster for the project itself (yes,
Jonah, they are both pgFoundry stuff, it's just that the website is
probably not maintained by pgcluster staff currently).
I agree with Gregory that renaming pgfoundry.org to
[whatever].postgresql.org could be a good idea to make it more
"official". And project sites should keep their
projectname.[whatever].postgresql.org address.
--
Guillaume